Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
At a Glance
| Compare |  Muse Spark 1.1Meta | Muse Glimmer 30BMeta |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4 | UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort | #39 of 5712.8 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 4.3–70.9 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.30Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $1.20Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Muse Spark 1.1 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | Meta |
| Family | Muse Spark | Muse Glimmer |
| Model | Muse Spark 1.1 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| Version | Muse Spark 1.1 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| Lifecycle | preview | active |
| Released | 2026-07-09 | 2026-08-09 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2026-01-04 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 131K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 29.8B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities
Muse Glimmer 30B Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
 Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text |
Muse Spark 1.1Meta | vs | Muse Spark 1.3Meta | family variantsimage, text, video |
Muse Spark 1.1Meta | vs |  InklingThinking Machines Lab | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B FAQs
Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Glimmer 30B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
Only Muse Glimmer 30B has a directly sourced input price: $0.30 per million tokens. Only Muse Glimmer 30B has a directly sourced output price: $1.20 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
Muse Spark 1.1 has the larger sourced context window. Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens and Muse Glimmer 30B supports 131,072 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B be self-hosted?+
Muse Glimmer 30B is documented as self-hostable; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented as not self-hostable. Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight; Muse Glimmer 30B is open weight.
Can Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Glimmer 30B understand images?+
Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input; Muse Glimmer 30B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.
Do Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Glimmer 30B support reasoning and tool use?+
Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Glimmer 30B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
Muse Spark 1.1 has 0 sourced provider routes; Muse Glimmer 30B has 3, so Muse Glimmer 30B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.