Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.50Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$9.00Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · statistical tie1,461.40100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.5-flash-high; 95% CI [1452.14297727, 1470.66464631]; votes 4061; rank 221,464.70100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1455.86175356, 1473.53929177]; votes 4885; rank 18
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-10-09-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader1,309.32100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.5-flash-medium; 95% CI [1302.39764204, 1316.24123214]; votes 13180; rank 141,292.7099% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1285.66303358, 1299.73172684]; votes 11994; rank 25
LiveBench2026-06-25-90f8d44da965 · overall · leader78.84100% of row best · percent · gemini-3.5-flash-high · 15,522 output tokens / case78.57100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.1-xhigh · 13,652 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie2 benchmark winsOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemini 3.5 FlashMuse Spark 1.1
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindMeta
FamilyGemini 3Muse Spark
ModelGemini 3.5 FlashMuse Spark 1.1
VersionGemini 3.5 FlashMuse Spark 1.1
Lifecycleactivepreview
ReleasedUnknown2026-07-09
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools

Gemini 3.5 Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3.5-flash

Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1 FAQs

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $1.50 per million tokens. Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $9.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Gemini 3.5 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1,048,576 tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Gemini 3.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3.5 Flash is not marked open weight; Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight.

Can Gemini 3.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 understand images?+

Gemini 3.5 Flash is documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a sourced maximum output of 65,536 tokens; Muse Spark 1.1's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.

Do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3.5 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Gemini 3.5 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.1 has 0, so Gemini 3.5 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback