Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000KNot reported
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 4, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader-2.9893% of row best · score · Muse Spark 1.1; 95% CI [-3.52464364, -2.43839720]; sessions 109338; observations 4434474; rank 334.20100% of row best · score · Muse Spark 1.3 (Max); 95% CI [3.33950614, 5.06185896]; sessions 31052; observations 2525117; rank 15
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,464.70100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1455.86175356, 1473.53929177]; votes 4885; rank 181,470.66100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.3-max; 95% CI [1452.36505006, 1488.94793707]; votes 1006; rank 15
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,480.1799% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1475.34892554, 1484.99642998]; votes 27615; rank 151,489.74100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.3-max; 95% CI [1480.91456937, 1498.56660928]; votes 4723; rank 10
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,294.1698% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1286.17018729, 1302.15601223]; votes 8447; rank 211,314.56100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.3-max; 95% CI [1299.74034111, 1329.38210317]; votes 1804; rank 8
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader78.5792% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.1-xhigh · 13,652 output tokens / case85.47100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.3-xhigh · 28,234 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified80.7698% of row best · points · Muse Spark 1.1 (thinking) · 6,037 output tokens / case82.63100% of row best · points · Muse Spark 1.3 (thinking) · 6,301 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 3 ties0 benchmark wins2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMuse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.3
DeveloperMetaMeta
FamilyMuse SparkMuse Spark
ModelMuse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.3
VersionMuse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.3
Lifecyclepreviewpreview
Released2026-07-092026-09-02
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, AudioText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000KUnknown
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessUnknownUnknown
Capabilitieschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, toolschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, tools

Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.1

Muse Spark 1.3 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 FAQs

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.3?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.3?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Muse Spark 1.1 is 1,000K and Muse Spark 1.3 is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.3?+

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 5 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight; Muse Spark 1.3 is not marked open weight.

Can Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.3 understand images?+

Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Spark 1.1 is — and Muse Spark 1.3 is —.

Do Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Spark 1.3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.3?+

Muse Spark 1.1 has 0 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.3 has 0, a tie.

Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback