Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind |  Muse Spark 1.1Meta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.30Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.50Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-10-09-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader | 1,235.4596% of row best · rating · gemini-2.5-flash; 95% CI [1230.89884927, 1239.99599852]; votes 60112; rank 74 | 1,292.70100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1285.66303358, 1299.73172684]; votes 11994; rank 25 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Meta |
| Family | Gemini 2 5 | Muse Spark |
| Model | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Version | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-07-09 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools |
Gemini 2.5 Flash Capabilities
Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
 DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini Computer UseGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  MAI-Transcribe 2Microsoft | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | VibeVoice-ASR-Streaming-1.5BMicrosoft | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | VibeVoice-ASR-Streaming-7BMicrosoft | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1 FAQs
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Only Gemini 2.5 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.30 per million tokens. Only Gemini 2.5 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $2.50 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Gemini 2.5 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1,048,576 tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemini 2.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 2.5 Flash is not marked open weight; Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 understand images?+
Gemini 2.5 Flash is documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Gemini 2.5 Flash has a sourced maximum output of 65,536 tokens; Muse Spark 1.1's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.
Do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 2.5 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Gemini 2.5 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.1 has 0, so Gemini 2.5 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.