Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-07-30-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,420.8797% of row best · rating · gemini-2.5-pro; 95% CI [1414.58328718, 1427.16017237]; votes 24963; rank 31 | 1,471.66100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1458.80838072, 1484.51367096]; votes 2054; rank 13 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,457.8299% of row best · rating · gemini-2.5-pro; 95% CI [1455.34940240, 1460.28624287]; votes 122575; rank 33 | 1,479.03100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1473.99485495, 1484.06002682]; votes 23768; rank 14 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,262.4298% of row best · rating · gemini-2.5-pro; 95% CI [1257.72056767, 1267.11330698]; votes 87719; rank 41 | 1,292.67100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1283.99834736, 1301.34176251]; votes 6769; rank 21 |
| ToneBench2026-08-28-10-task-cd9819ab6e4d · overall_score · leader | 78.2797% of row best · points · Gemini 2.5 Pro · 4,521 output tokens / case | 80.76100% of row best · points · Muse Spark 1.1 (thinking) · 6,037 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 4 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Meta |
| Family | Gemini 2 5 | Muse Spark |
| Model | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Version | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-07-09 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools |
12 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Gemini 2.5 Pro Capabilities
Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1 FAQs
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 2.5 Pro and Muse Spark 1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Only Gemini 2.5 Pro has a directly sourced input price: $1.25 per million tokens. Only Gemini 2.5 Pro has a directly sourced output price: $10.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1,049K and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Muse Spark 1.1 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 2.5 Pro is not marked open weight; Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Gemini 2.5 Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 understand images?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro is documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 2.5 Pro is 66K and Muse Spark 1.1 is —.
Do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro has 2 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.1 has 0, so Gemini 2.5 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.