Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind |  Muse Spark 1.1Meta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.25Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $10.00Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader | 1,421.2397% of row best · rating · gemini-2.5-pro; 95% CI [1414.98072895, 1427.48825137]; votes 25110; rank 36 | 1,464.70100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1455.86175356, 1473.53929177]; votes 4885; rank 18 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-10-09-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader | 1,263.2998% of row best · rating · gemini-2.5-pro; 95% CI [1258.74589708, 1267.83852907]; votes 88805; rank 51 | 1,292.70100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1285.66303358, 1299.73172684]; votes 11994; rank 25 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 2 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Meta |
| Family | Gemini 2 5 | Muse Spark |
| Model | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Version | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-07-09 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools |
Gemini 2.5 Pro Capabilities
Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
 Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini Deep Research MaxGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini Deep ResearchGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini Computer UseGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  MAI-Transcribe 2Microsoft | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | VibeVoice-ASR-Streaming-1.5BMicrosoft | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1 FAQs
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 2.5 Pro and Muse Spark 1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Only Gemini 2.5 Pro has a directly sourced input price: $1.25 per million tokens. Only Gemini 2.5 Pro has a directly sourced output price: $10.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1,048,576 tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 2.5 Pro is not marked open weight; Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Gemini 2.5 Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 understand images?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro is documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a sourced maximum output of 65,536 tokens; Muse Spark 1.1's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.
Do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro has 2 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.1 has 0, so Gemini 2.5 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.