Gemma 4 E4B vs Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemma 4 E4B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google Deepmind | Meta |
| Family | Gemma 4 | Muse Spark |
| Model | Gemma 4 E4B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Version | Gemma 4 E4B | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-03-02 | 2026-07-09 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131,072 | 1,000,000 |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools |
13 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Gemma 4 E4B Capabilities
Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Muse Spark 1.1Meta | vs | Muse Spark 1.2Meta | family variantsaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle Deepmind | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle Deepmind | family variantsaudio, image, text, video |
Muse Spark 1.1Meta | vs | InklingThinking Machines Lab | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 12BGoogle Deepmind | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle Deepmind | family variantsaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle Deepmind | vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle Deepmind | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle Deepmind | vs | Muse Spark 1.2Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Muse Spark 1.1Meta | vs |  Phi-4-multimodal-instructMicrosoft | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text |
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle Deepmind | vs |  GLM-5V-TurboZ.ai | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Muse Spark 1.1Meta | vs | Muse Glimmer 30BMeta | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 1.8ByteDance Seed | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle Deepmind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemma 4 E4B vs Muse Spark 1.1 FAQs
Is Gemma 4 E4B or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 E4B and Muse Spark 1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 E4B or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Only Gemma 4 E4B has a directly sourced input price: $0.020 per million tokens. Only Gemma 4 E4B has a directly sourced output price: $0.10 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 E4B or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Muse Spark 1.1 has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 E4B supports 131,072 and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000,000.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 E4B or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemma 4 E4B or Muse Spark 1.1 be self-hosted?+
Gemma 4 E4B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemma 4 E4B is open weight; Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Gemma 4 E4B and Muse Spark 1.1 understand images?+
Gemma 4 E4B is documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 E4B or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 E4B is — and Muse Spark 1.1 is —.
Do Gemma 4 E4B and Muse Spark 1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemma 4 E4B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 E4B or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Gemma 4 E4B has 2 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.1 has 0, so Gemma 4 E4B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemma 4 E4B or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.