Lyria 3.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Lyria 3.5 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google Deepmind | Meta |
| Family | Lyria | Muse Spark |
| Model | Lyria 3.5 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Version | Lyria 3.5 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-07-29 | 2026-07-09 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text, Audio | Text |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 1,000,000 |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | generation, image-to-music, lyrics, music-generation, synthid, vocals | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools |
13 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Lyria 3.5 Capabilities
Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Muse Spark 1.1Meta | vs | Muse Spark 1.2Meta | family variantsaudio, image, text, video |
Lyria 3.5Google Deepmind | vs |  stable-audio-3-mediumStability AI | cross-developer peersaudio |
 MiniMax-Music3MiniMax | vs | Lyria 3.5Google Deepmind | cross-developer peersaudio |
Muse Spark 1.1Meta | vs | InklingThinking Machines Lab | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle Deepmind | vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle Deepmind | vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Muse Spark 1.1Meta | vs |  Phi-4-multimodal-instructMicrosoft | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text |
Muse Spark 1.1Meta | vs | Muse Glimmer 30BMeta | cross-developer peersimage, text |
| vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, text | |
| vs | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, text | |
Muse Spark 1.1Meta | vs | VibeVoice-ASR-Streaming-7BMicrosoft | cross-developer peersaudio, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Lyria 3.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 FAQs
Is Lyria 3.5 or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Lyria 3.5 and Muse Spark 1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Lyria 3.5 or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, Lyria 3.5 or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Lyria 3.5 has the larger sourced context window. Lyria 3.5 supports 1,048,576 and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000,000.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Lyria 3.5 or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Lyria 3.5 or Muse Spark 1.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Lyria 3.5 is not marked open weight; Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Lyria 3.5 and Muse Spark 1.1 understand images?+
Lyria 3.5 is not documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Lyria 3.5 or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Lyria 3.5 is 65,536 and Muse Spark 1.1 is —.
Do Lyria 3.5 and Muse Spark 1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Lyria 3.5: none of these features are definitively sourced. Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Lyria 3.5 or Muse Spark 1.1?+
Lyria 3.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.1 has 0, so Lyria 3.5 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Lyria 3.5 or Muse Spark 1.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.