Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-07-30-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,468.9099% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-8; 95% CI [1460.58009276, 1477.22476172]; votes 8193; rank 161,478.68100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh; 95% CI [1461.94144922, 1495.42273628]; votes 1152; rank 11
LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-08-24-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,204.3096% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-8; 95% CI [1197.89112684, 1210.71069451]; votes 70998; rank 121,257.26100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh; 95% CI [1249.79496224, 1264.72573796]; votes 29663; rank 1
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,451.98100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-8; 95% CI [1447.69484580, 1456.25837678]; votes 49123; rank 381,454.69100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh; 95% CI [1449.58093424, 1459.80348090]; votes 23153; rank 35
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,288.81100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-8; 95% CI [1281.38044914, 1296.24567110]; votes 13980; rank 231,276.9099% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh; 95% CI [1267.71657009, 1286.08047215]; votes 5837; rank 30
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader81.1895% of row best · percent · claude-opus-4-8-max-effort · 24,171 output tokens / case85.26100% of row best · percent · gpt-5.6-sol-max · 11,729 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-08-14-10-task · overall_score · leader88.09100% of row best · points · Claude Opus 4.8 (max effort) · 13,476 output tokens / case87.89100% of row best · points · GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · 6,160 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 3 ties1 benchmark win2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Anthropic · activeClaude Opus 4.8Verified Aug 29, 2026
OpenAI · activeGPT-5.6 SolVerified Aug 28, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 Sol
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaude 4 8Gpt 5 6
ModelClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 Sol
VersionClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 Sol
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-05-28Unknown
Knowledge cutoff2026-01-012026-02-16
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000,0001,050,000
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)OpenAI (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

14 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Claude Opus 4.8 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$5.00
Output price$25.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-opus-4-8

GPT-5.6 Sol Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$2.00
Output price$10.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.6-sol

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Sol FAQs

Is Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6 Sol, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol?+

Claude Opus 4.8 is $5.00 and GPT-5.6 Sol is $2.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5.6 Sol is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 4.8 is $25.00 and GPT-5.6 Sol is $10.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5.6 Sol is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol?+

GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger sourced context window. Claude Opus 4.8 supports 1,000,000 and GPT-5.6 Sol supports 1,050,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol?+

GPT-5.6 Sol leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 6 protocol-matched benchmarks from 3 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 4.8 is not marked open weight; GPT-5.6 Sol is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6 Sol understand images?+

Claude Opus 4.8 is documented with image input; GPT-5.6 Sol is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Opus 4.8 is 128,000 and GPT-5.6 Sol is 128,000.

Do Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6 Sol support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Opus 4.8: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.6 Sol: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol?+

Claude Opus 4.8 has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.6 Sol has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback