Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.8
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-15fb467fd4fc · verified_score · leader47.6752% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)92.50100% of row best · percent · Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-9a3db289984e · verified_score · leader4.036% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)72.08100% of row best · percent · Claude Opus 4.8 (High)
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-07-30-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,423.0397% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1416.59570790, 1429.45877492]; votes 30937; rank 301,468.90100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-8; 95% CI [1460.58009276, 1477.22476172]; votes 8193; rank 16
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,395.2596% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1392.70335168, 1397.78975878]; votes 124979; rank 1441,451.98100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-8; 95% CI [1447.69484580, 1456.25837678]; votes 49123; rank 38
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins4 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Anthropic · activeClaude Haiku 4.5Verified Aug 28, 2026
Anthropic · activeClaude Opus 4.8Verified Aug 29, 2026
Not a Valid ComparisonThese records do not share a sourced modality and workload.

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Interactive only
FieldClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.8
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic
FamilyClaude 4 5Claude 4 8
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.8
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.8
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-152026-05-28
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2026-01-01
Input modalitiesUnknownUnknown
Output modalitiesUnknownUnknown
Context window200,0001,000,000
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

12 comparable fields · 5 material differences · Interactive comparison only; indexing gate not met

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$1.00
Output price$5.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

Claude Opus 4.8 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$5.00
Output price$25.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-opus-4-8

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.8 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.8, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.8?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and Claude Opus 4.8 is $5.00 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and Claude Opus 4.8 is $25.00 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.8?+

Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200,000 and Claude Opus 4.8 supports 1,000,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.8?+

Claude Opus 4.8 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.8 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; Claude Opus 4.8 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is not documented with image input; Claude Opus 4.8 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.8?+

Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 64,000 and Claude Opus 4.8 supports 128,000 output tokens.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning and tool calling. Claude Opus 4.8: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.8?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Claude Opus 4.8 has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.8?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8: AI Model Comparison · Model Markets