Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Fable 5Anthropic | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $10.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $50.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $25.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-613c385b0c93 · verified_score · leader | 98.50100% of row best · percent · Claude Fable 5 (XHigh) | 92.5094% of row best · percent · Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-be40992860f9 · verified_score · leader | 89.17100% of row best · percent · Claude Fable 5 (Max) | 72.0881% of row best · percent · Claude Opus 4.8 (High) |
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · leader | 1,496.08100% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5; 95% CI [1488.22135990, 1503.94311259]; votes 8497; rank 5 | 1,464.0798% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-8; 95% CI [1457.10320334, 1471.03216030]; votes 12128; rank 19 |
| LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-10-13-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · leader | 1,229.14100% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5-high; 95% CI [1222.63001070, 1235.64949261]; votes 73596; rank 10 | 1,204.1198% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-8; 95% CI [1198.48669076, 1209.73163091]; votes 106304; rank 19 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-10-09-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · leader | 1,323.95100% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5-high; 95% CI [1316.82313713, 1331.08571856]; votes 14175; rank 1 | 1,288.5297% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-8; 95% CI [1282.01202676, 1295.03051235]; votes 18852; rank 29 |
| LiveBench2026-06-25-90f8d44da965 · overall · leader | 86.55100% of row best · percent · claude-fable-5-max-effort · 20,255 output tokens / case | 81.1894% of row best · percent · claude-opus-4-8-max-effort · 24,171 output tokens / case |
| ToneBench2026-10-17-10-task-e9c76358afb2 · overall_score · unverified | 81.90100% of row best · points · Claude Fable 5 (high) · 24,076 output tokens / case | 80.7099% of row best · points · Claude Opus 4.8 (max effort) · 46,601 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 6 benchmark winsOverall lead | 0 benchmark wins |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Family | Claude 5 | Claude 4 8 |
| Model | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Version | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-06-09 | 2026-05-28 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2026-01-01 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Claude Fable 5 Capabilities
Claude Opus 4.8 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs |  GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | GPT-4.1OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | GPT-4.1 MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.7 FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | Qwen3.7 MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 FAQs
Is Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.8 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Fable 5 and Claude Opus 4.8, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.8?+
Claude Fable 5 is $10.00 and Claude Opus 4.8 is $5.00 per million tokens, so Claude Opus 4.8 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Fable 5 is $50.00 and Claude Opus 4.8 is $25.00 per million tokens, so Claude Opus 4.8 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.8?+
Both models have the same sourced context window: 1,000,000 tokens each.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.8?+
Claude Fable 5 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 6 protocol-matched benchmarks from 3 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.8 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Fable 5 is not marked open weight; Claude Opus 4.8 is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Fable 5 and Claude Opus 4.8 understand images?+
Claude Fable 5 is documented with image input; Claude Opus 4.8 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.8?+
Both models have the same sourced maximum output: 128,000 tokens each.
Do Claude Fable 5 and Claude Opus 4.8 support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Fable 5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Claude Opus 4.8: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.8?+
Claude Fable 5 has 3 sourced provider routes; Claude Opus 4.8 has 2, so Claude Fable 5 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.8?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.