Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.4

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.4
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-15fb467fd4fc · verified_score · leader92.5099% of row best · percent · Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)93.67100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.4 (XHigh)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-9a3db289984e · verified_score · leader72.0897% of row best · percent · Claude Opus 4.8 (High)73.95100% of row best · percent · GPT-5.4 (XHigh)
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-07-30-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,468.90100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-8; 95% CI [1460.58009276, 1477.22476172]; votes 8193; rank 161,470.14100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4; 95% CI [1463.54357191, 1476.73400825]; votes 29809; rank 15
LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-08-24-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,204.30100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-8; 95% CI [1197.89112684, 1210.71069451]; votes 70998; rank 121,197.1699% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4-search; 95% CI [1191.73811150, 1202.57682579]; votes 110116; rank 16
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,451.98100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-8; 95% CI [1447.69484580, 1456.25837678]; votes 49123; rank 381,452.51100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4; 95% CI [1448.73439083, 1456.28324387]; votes 63615; rank 37
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,288.81100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-8; 95% CI [1281.38044914, 1296.24567110]; votes 13980; rank 231,293.18100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4; 95% CI [1286.41064849, 1299.95761489]; votes 21245; rank 20
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader81.1899% of row best · percent · claude-opus-4-8-max-effort · 24,171 output tokens / case82.38100% of row best · percent · gpt-5.4-xhigh · 18,273 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-08-28-10-task-cd9819ab6e4d · overall_score · leader87.91100% of row best · points · Claude Opus 4.8 (max effort) · 2,741 output tokens / case82.4794% of row best · points · GPT-5.4 · 3,254 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 4 ties1 benchmark win3 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Anthropic · activeClaude Opus 4.8Verified Aug 29, 2026
Openai · activeGPT-5.4Verified Sep 3, 2026
Not a Valid ComparisonThese records do not share a sourced modality and workload.

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Interactive only
FieldClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.4
DeveloperAnthropicOpenai
FamilyClaude 4 8Gpt 5 4
ModelClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.4
VersionClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.4
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-05-282026-03-05
Knowledge cutoff2026-01-012025-08-31
Input modalitiesUnknownUnknown
Output modalitiesUnknownUnknown
Context window1,000,0001,050,000
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

13 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Interactive comparison only; indexing gate not met

Claude Opus 4.8 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$5.00
Output price$25.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-opus-4-8

GPT-5.4 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$2.50
Output price$15.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.4

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.4 FAQs

Is Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.4 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.4, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.4?+

Claude Opus 4.8 is $5.00 and GPT-5.4 is $2.50 per million tokens, so GPT-5.4 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 4.8 is $25.00 and GPT-5.4 is $15.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5.4 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.4?+

GPT-5.4 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Opus 4.8 supports 1,000,000 and GPT-5.4 supports 1,050,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.4?+

GPT-5.4 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 8 protocol-matched benchmarks from 4 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.4 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 4.8 is not marked open weight; GPT-5.4 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.4 understand images?+

Claude Opus 4.8 is not documented with image input; GPT-5.4 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.4?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Opus 4.8 is 128,000 and GPT-5.4 is 128,000.

Do Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.4 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Opus 4.8: reasoning and tool calling. GPT-5.4: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.4?+

Claude Opus 4.8 has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.4 has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.4?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback