Qwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent
At a Glance
| Compare | Qwen3.7 PlusQwen | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.32Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $1.25Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.28Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $2.50Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7-Plus | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,454.20100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1449.75378609, 1458.63820942]; votes 39334; rank 39 | 1,449.94100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1446.16660741, 1453.71198087]; votes 60777; rank 46 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,277.81100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1270.28208926, 1285.34488566]; votes 10656; rank 31 | 1,259.5599% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1253.19837141, 1265.89693020]; votes 22925; rank 46 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3.7-Plus | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | xAI |
| Family | Qwen3 7 Plus | Grok 4 20 |
| Model | Qwen3.7-Plus | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Version | Qwen3.7-Plus | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision | generation, reasoning, research, tools |
Qwen3.7 Plus Capabilities
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs
Is Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.7 Plus and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Qwen3.7 Plus is $0.32 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $1.25 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.7 Plus is $1.28 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $2.50 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Qwen3.7 Plus is 1,000K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Qwen3.7 Plus is not marked open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.
Can Qwen3.7 Plus and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+
Qwen3.7 Plus is documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.7 Plus is 131K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.
Do Qwen3.7 Plus and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3.7 Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Qwen3.7 Plus has 4 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, so Qwen3.7 Plus has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.