Qwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.32Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$1.25Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.28Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$2.50Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkQwen3.7-PlusGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,454.20100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1449.75378609, 1458.63820942]; votes 39334; rank 391,449.94100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1446.16660741, 1453.71198087]; votes 60777; rank 46
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,277.81100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1270.28208926, 1285.34488566]; votes 10656; rank 311,259.5599% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1253.19837141, 1265.89693020]; votes 22925; rank 46
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3.7-PlusGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
DeveloperQwenxAI
FamilyQwen3 7 PlusGrok 4 20
ModelQwen3.7-PlusGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
VersionQwen3.7-PlusGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Lifecycleactivepreview
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAlibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, visiongeneration, reasoning, research, tools

Qwen3.7 Plus Capabilities

agentschatcomputer-usereasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.7-plus

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities

generationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs

Is Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.7 Plus and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Qwen3.7 Plus is $0.32 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $1.25 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.7 Plus is $1.28 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $2.50 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Qwen3.7 Plus is 1,000K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Qwen3.7 Plus is not marked open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.

Can Qwen3.7 Plus and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+

Qwen3.7 Plus is documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.7 Plus is 131K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.

Do Qwen3.7 Plus and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.7 Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Qwen3.7 Plus has 4 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, so Qwen3.7 Plus has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback