Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingKimi-K3Qwen3.7-Plus
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2#11 of 2271.3 scoreUnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#24 of 36$0.194 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0#13 of 2251.7 scoreUnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkKimi-K3Qwen3.7-Plus
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,476.31100% of row best · rating · kimi-k3-max; 95% CI [1470.86166728, 1481.76254962]; votes 17895; rank 161,453.7098% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1449.21174793, 1458.19774266]; votes 37854; rank 36
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Moonshot AI · activeKimi K3Verified Aug 28, 2026
Qwen · activeQwen3.7 PlusVerified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldKimi-K3Qwen3.7-Plus
DeveloperMoonshot AIQwen
FamilyKimi K3Qwen3 7 Plus
ModelKimi-K3Qwen3.7-Plus
VersionKimi-K3Qwen3.7-Plus
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-07-16Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parameters2.8TUnknown
Active parameters104BUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningagents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

13 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price$2.85
Output price$14.25
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

Qwen3.7 Plus Capabilities

agentschatcomputer-usereasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$0.32
Output price$1.28
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.7-plus

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsembedding, image, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus FAQs

Is Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K3 and Qwen3.7 Plus, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Kimi K3 is $2.85 and Qwen3.7 Plus is $0.32 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric. Kimi K3 is $14.25 and Qwen3.7 Plus is $1.28 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Kimi K3 has the larger sourced context window. Kimi K3 supports 1,049K and Qwen3.7 Plus supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Plus be self-hosted?+

Kimi K3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Kimi K3 is open weight; Qwen3.7 Plus is not marked open weight.

Can Kimi K3 and Qwen3.7 Plus understand images?+

Kimi K3 is documented with image input; Qwen3.7 Plus is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K3 is — and Qwen3.7 Plus is 131K.

Do Kimi K3 and Qwen3.7 Plus support reasoning and tool use?+

Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Qwen3.7 Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Kimi K3 has 5 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.7 Plus has 4, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback