Qwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.6

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingQwen3.7-PlusGrok 4.6
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort#13 of 2267.6 score
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort#18 of 36$0.097 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort#8 of 2256.6 score

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkQwen3.7-PlusGrok 4.6
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-08-31-011508720696 · outcome_score · leader-2.7092% of row best · score · Qwen3.7 Plus; 95% CI [-4.00378740, -1.40029439]; sessions 18748; observations 834350; rank 385.76100% of row best · score · Grok 4.6 (xHigh); 95% CI [4.47058991, 7.04827601]; sessions 15090; observations 1574671; rank 16
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,453.70100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1449.21174793, 1458.19774266]; votes 37854; rank 361,443.7599% of row best · rating · grok-4.6-high; 95% CI [1433.62910542, 1453.86294509]; votes 3453; rank 55
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie0 benchmark wins1 benchmark winOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Qwen · activeQwen3.7 PlusVerified Aug 29, 2026
xAI · activeGrok 4.6Verified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldQwen3.7-PlusGrok 4.6
DeveloperQwenxAI
FamilyQwen3 7 PlusGrok 4
ModelQwen3.7-PlusGrok 4.6
VersionQwen3.7-PlusGrok 4.6
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2026-02-01
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K500K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAlibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, visionchat, generation, reasoning, tools

13 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Qwen3.7 Plus Capabilities

agentschatcomputer-usereasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$0.32
Output price$1.28
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.7-plus

Grok 4.6 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$2.00
Output price$6.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.6

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantsimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.6 FAQs

Is Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.6 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.7 Plus and Grok 4.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.6?+

Qwen3.7 Plus is $0.32 and Grok 4.6 is $2.00 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.7 Plus is $1.28 and Grok 4.6 is $6.00 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.6?+

Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.7 Plus supports 1,000K and Grok 4.6 supports 500K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.6?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.6 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Qwen3.7 Plus is not marked open weight; Grok 4.6 is not marked open weight.

Can Qwen3.7 Plus and Grok 4.6 understand images?+

Qwen3.7 Plus is documented with image input; Grok 4.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.6?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.7 Plus is 131K and Grok 4.6 is —.

Do Qwen3.7 Plus and Grok 4.6 support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.7 Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.6?+

Qwen3.7 Plus has 4 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.6 has 1, so Qwen3.7 Plus has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.6?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback