DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#5 of 44$0.022 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.15DeepSeek · Sep 10, 2026$0.32Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.60Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$1.28Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 10, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen3.7-Plus
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader4.88100% of row best · score · Deepseek V4.1 Flash (Max); 95% CI [3.54852933, 6.21109128]; sessions 20080; observations 2295632; rank 12-6.0890% of row best · score · Qwen3.7 Plus; 95% CI [-7.29245632, -4.87295146]; sessions 20905; observations 993739; rank 40
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen3.7-Plus
DeveloperDeepSeekQwen
FamilyDeepseek V4 1Qwen3 7 Plus
ModelDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen3.7-Plus
VersionDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen3.7-Plus
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-10Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parameters763.2BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, fim, generation, reasoning, responses, structured_outputs, tools, visionagents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision
Architecture designCausal Encoder-Decoder (20 encoder + 20 decoder layers)Unknown
Backbone parameters552000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during decode16000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during prefill8000000000 parametersUnknown
Pre-training corpus45000000000000 tokensUnknown
Reasoning effort range1–100Unknown
Routed experts per MoE layer384 expertsUnknown
Routed experts per token6 expertsUnknown
Transformer layers40 layersUnknown

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Capabilities

agentschatfimgenerationreasoningresponsesstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Qwen3.7 Plus Capabilities

agentschatcomputer-usereasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.7-plus

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.7 Plus, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.15 and Qwen3.7 Plus is $0.32 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.60 and Qwen3.7 Plus is $1.28 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports 1,049K and Qwen3.7 Plus supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.7 Plus be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open weight; Qwen3.7 Plus is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.7 Plus understand images?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is documented with image input; Qwen3.7 Plus is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger sourced maximum output: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports 393K and Qwen3.7 Plus supports 131K output tokens.

Do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.7 Plus support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.7 Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 3 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.7 Plus has 4, so Qwen3.7 Plus has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback