Model Markets
Get Free API KeyAPI

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs pi 0.7

At a Glance

Compare
pi 0.7Physical Intelligence
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049KNot reported
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →
Different Model RolesThese models do not share a sourced market category. Their primary-source facts remain comparable below, while performance claims require matched evidence.

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3Bpi 0.7
DeveloperNVIDIAPhysical Intelligence
FamilyNvidia Nemotron 3 5 Lightningpi
ModelNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3Bpi 0.7
VersionNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B0.7
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-08-112026-04-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Robot state
Output modalitiesTextRobot action
Context window1,049KUnknown
Total parameters30BUnknown
Active parameters3BUnknown
Licenseopenmdw-1.1Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableYesUnknown
Provider accessFireworks Ai (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitiesagents, chat, generation, reasoning, toolscross-embodiment, dexterous-manipulation, language-steering, visual-subgoals
Robotics model typeUnknownVision-language-action model
Action representationUnknownContinuous robot actions conditioned by multimodal prompts
Control architectureUnknownHigh-level policy, world model, and action expert
Inference locationUnknownUnknown
Native control rate (Hz)UnknownUnknown
Supported embodimentsUnknownmobile manipulators, bimanual UR5e, multiple fixed manipulators
Training dataUnknownRobot demonstrations, autonomous data, egocentric human data, and multimodal web data described by the publisher.

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningtools
Model typeUnknown
InferenceUnknown
Action representationUnknown
Supported embodimentsUnknown
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-BF16

pi 0.7 Capabilities

cross-embodimentdexterous-manipulationlanguage-steeringvisual-subgoals
Model typeVision-language-action model
InferenceUnknown
Action representationContinuous robot actions conditioned by multimodal prompts
Supported embodiments3
Canonical IDphysical-intelligence/pi-0.7

Related Comparisons

APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-BF16 developer model repositoryNVIDIA · observed Sep 3, 2026pi 0.7: a Steerable Model with Emergent CapabilitiesPhysical Intelligence · observed Aug 29, 2026

Questions

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs pi 0.7 FAQs

Is NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or pi 0.7 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B and pi 0.7, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or pi 0.7?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or pi 0.7?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is 1,049K and pi 0.7 is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or pi 0.7?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or pi 0.7 be self-hosted?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is open weight; pi 0.7 is not marked open weight.

Can NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B and pi 0.7 understand images?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is not documented with image input; pi 0.7 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or pi 0.7?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is — and pi 0.7 is —.

Do NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B and pi 0.7 support reasoning and tool use?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: reasoning and tool calling. pi 0.7: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or pi 0.7?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has 1 sourced provider route; pi 0.7 has 0, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or pi 0.7?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback