DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#5 of 44$0.022 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.15DeepSeek · Sep 10, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.60Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,049K
Model facts checkedSep 10, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
DeveloperDeepSeekNVIDIA
FamilyDeepseek V4 1Nvidia Nemotron 3 5 Lightning
ModelDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
VersionDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-102026-08-11
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,049K
Total parameters763.2B30B
Active parametersUnknown3B
Licensemitopenmdw-1.1
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Fireworks Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, fim, generation, reasoning, responses, structured_outputs, tools, visionagents, chat, generation, reasoning, tools
Architecture designCausal Encoder-Decoder (20 encoder + 20 decoder layers)Unknown
Backbone parameters552000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during decode16000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during prefill8000000000 parametersUnknown
Pre-training corpus45000000000000 tokensUnknown
Reasoning effort range1–100Unknown
Routed experts per MoE layer384 expertsUnknown
Routed experts per token6 expertsUnknown
Transformer layers40 layersUnknown

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Capabilities

agentschatfimgenerationreasoningresponsesstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-BF16

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.15 per million tokens. Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $0.60 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 1,049K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B understand images?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 393K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is —.

Do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 3 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has 1, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback