Kimi K3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingKimi-K3NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#24 of 36$0.194 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkKimi-K3NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,476.31100% of row best · rating · kimi-k3-max; 95% CI [1470.86166728, 1481.76254962]; votes 17895; rank 161,331.8490% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3.5-lightning-30b-a3b-nvfp4; 95% CI [1322.39322537, 1341.28358716]; votes 4533; rank 207
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Moonshot AI · activeKimi K3Verified Aug 28, 2026
NVIDIA · activeNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BVerified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldKimi-K3NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
DeveloperMoonshot AINVIDIA
FamilyKimi K3Nvidia Nemotron 3 5 Lightning
ModelKimi-K3NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
VersionKimi-K3NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-07-162026-08-11
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,049K
Total parameters2.8T30B
Active parameters104B3B
Licenseotheropenmdw-1.1
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Fireworks Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningagents, chat, generation, reasoning, tools

17 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price$2.85
Output price$14.25
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers1
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-BF16

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsembedding, image, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Kimi K3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B FAQs

Is Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K3 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Only Kimi K3 has a directly sourced input price: $2.85 per million tokens. Only Kimi K3 has a directly sourced output price: $14.25 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Kimi K3 is 1,049K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Kimi K3 is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is open weight.

Can Kimi K3 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B understand images?+

Kimi K3 is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K3 is — and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is —.

Do Kimi K3 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B support reasoning and tool use?+

Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Kimi K3 has 5 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has 1, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback