Inkling vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent
At a Glance
| Compare | InklingThinking Machines Lab | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #34 of 4645.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete | #22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6 |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #18 of 44$0.090 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #28 of 3848.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.95Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $1.25Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $4.05Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $2.50Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Inkling | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader | 79.5089% of row best · percent · Inkling | 89.50100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader | 36.5356% of row best · percent · Inkling | 65.14100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,439.6899% of row best · rating · inkling; 95% CI [1434.76600975, 1444.58550789]; votes 25922; rank 67 | 1,449.94100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1446.16660741, 1453.71198087]; votes 60777; rank 46 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 3 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Inkling | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Thinking Machines Lab | xAI |
| Family | Inkling | Grok 4 20 |
| Model | Inkling | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Version | Inkling | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-07-15 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 975B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 41B | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools, vision | generation, reasoning, research, tools |
Inkling Capabilities
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | vs | InklingThinking Machines Lab | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | InklingThinking Machines Lab | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | InklingThinking Machines Lab | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | InklingThinking Machines Lab | cross-developer peersimage, text |
InklingThinking Machines Lab | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | vs | InklingThinking Machines Lab | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | InklingThinking Machines Lab | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | InklingThinking Machines Lab | cross-developer peersimage, text |
InklingThinking Machines Lab | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
 Hy4 previewTencent | vs | InklingThinking Machines Lab | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | InklingThinking Machines Lab | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | InklingThinking Machines Lab | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Inkling vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs
Is Inkling or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Inkling and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Inkling or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Inkling is $0.95 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $1.25 per million tokens, so Inkling is cheaper on this metric. Inkling is $4.05 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $2.50 per million tokens, so Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Inkling or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Inkling has the larger sourced context window. Inkling supports 1,049K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Inkling or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Inkling or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+
Inkling is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Inkling is open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.
Can Inkling and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+
Inkling is documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Inkling or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Inkling is — and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.
Do Inkling and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+
Inkling: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Inkling or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Inkling has 4 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, so Inkling has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Inkling or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.