Qwen3.8 Max vs Inkling

At a Glance

Compare
InklingThinking Machines Lab
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#10 of 4679.2 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 52.8–86.1#34 of 4645.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#23 of 44$0.107 per LiveBench case#18 of 44$0.090 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#6 of 3863.2 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 50.0–66.7#28 of 3848.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.65Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026$0.95Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$4.951Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026$4.05Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkQwen3.8-MaxInkling
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader3.30100% of row best · score · Qwen3.8 Max; 95% CI [2.46604139, 4.14181105]; sessions 31489; observations 2502655; rank 17-10.0287% of row best · score · Inkling; 95% CI [-10.93664189, -9.10513108]; sessions 42313; observations 1624204; rank 42
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,480.55100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1474.79040793, 1486.31846927]; votes 16670; rank 141,439.6897% of row best · rating · inkling; 95% CI [1434.76600975, 1444.58550789]; votes 25922; rank 67
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader81.88100% of row best · percent · qwen3.8-max · 21,637 output tokens / case76.4793% of row best · percent · inkling-xhigh · 22,213 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified83.32100% of row best · points · Qwen3.8 Max · 22,888 output tokens / case79.4195% of row best · points · Inkling · 5,785 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above3 benchmark winsOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3.8-MaxInkling
DeveloperQwenThinking Machines Lab
FamilyQwen3 8 MaxInkling
ModelQwen3.8-MaxInkling
VersionQwen3.8-MaxInkling
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-07-15
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K1,049K
Total parameters2.4T975B
Active parametersUnknown41B
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAlibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, visionagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools, vision

Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.8-max

Inkling Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDthinkingmachines/Inkling

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.8 Max vs Inkling FAQs

Is Qwen3.8 Max or Inkling better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.8 Max and Inkling, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max or Inkling?+

Qwen3.8 Max is $1.65 and Inkling is $0.95 per million tokens, so Inkling is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.8 Max is $4.951 and Inkling is $4.05 per million tokens, so Inkling is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.8 Max or Inkling?+

Inkling has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.8 Max supports 1,000K and Inkling supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Max or Inkling?+

Qwen3.8 Max leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Qwen3.8 Max or Inkling be self-hosted?+

Inkling is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight; Inkling is open weight.

Can Qwen3.8 Max and Inkling understand images?+

Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input; Inkling is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.8 Max or Inkling?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.8 Max is 131K and Inkling is —.

Do Qwen3.8 Max and Inkling support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Inkling: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.8 Max or Inkling?+

Qwen3.8 Max has 4 sourced provider routes; Inkling has 4, a tie.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.8 Max or Inkling?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback