Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

At a Glance

Compare
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.090Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$0.32Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.34Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$1.28Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BQwen3.7-Plus
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,424.5199% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1416.71159012, 1432.31286462]; votes 12326; rank 351,444.14100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1435.12302267, 1453.16578005]; votes 4591; rank 30
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,441.6899% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1434.13929794, 1449.22204224]; votes 5894; rank 641,454.20100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1449.75378609, 1458.63820942]; votes 39334; rank 39
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,275.98100% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1269.84273447, 1282.11308989]; votes 35713; rank 331,277.81100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1270.28208926, 1285.34488566]; votes 10656; rank 31
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie0 benchmark winsNo overall winner2 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemma 4 31BQwen3.7-Plus
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindQwen
FamilyGemma 4Qwen3 7 Plus
ModelGemma 4 31BQwen3.7-Plus
VersionGemma 4 31BQwen3.7-Plus
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-03-11Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,000K
Total parameters31BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessCerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsagents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

Gemma 4 31B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers5
Canonical IDgoogle/gemma-4-31B-it

Qwen3.7 Plus Capabilities

agentschatcomputer-usereasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.7-plus

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.7 Plus FAQs

Is Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.7 Plus, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Gemma 4 31B is $0.090 and Qwen3.7 Plus is $0.32 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric. Gemma 4 31B is $0.34 and Qwen3.7 Plus is $1.28 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 31B supports 262K and Qwen3.7 Plus supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.7 Plus be self-hosted?+

Gemma 4 31B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemma 4 31B is open weight; Qwen3.7 Plus is not marked open weight.

Can Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.7 Plus understand images?+

Gemma 4 31B is documented with image input; Qwen3.7 Plus is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 31B is — and Qwen3.7 Plus is 131K.

Do Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.7 Plus support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemma 4 31B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.7 Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Gemma 4 31B has 5 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.7 Plus has 4, so Gemma 4 31B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback