MiniMax M3 vs Gemma 4 31B
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | MiniMax-M3 | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #4 of 36$0.017 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-07-30-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,434.82100% of row best · rating · minimax-m3; 95% CI [1426.45297239, 1443.17975284]; votes 6263; rank 26 | 1,423.7099% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1415.51297276, 1431.88143488]; votes 10577; rank 29 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,435.20100% of row best · rating · minimax-m3; 95% CI [1430.86827835, 1439.53977389]; votes 44544; rank 77 | 1,441.82100% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1434.27306811, 1449.35895578]; votes 5900; rank 60 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,255.4298% of row best · rating · minimax-m3; 95% CI [1247.93588333, 1262.90862002]; votes 13390; rank 44 | 1,275.94100% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1269.53471972, 1282.35229256]; votes 34348; rank 31 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 2 ties | 0 benchmark wins | 1 benchmark winOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | MiniMax-M3 | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | MiniMax | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Minimax M3 | Gemma 4 |
| Model | MiniMax-M3 | Gemma 4 31B |
| Version | MiniMax-M3 | Gemma 4 31B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-06-01 | 2026-03-11 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 262K |
| Total parameters | 427B | 31B |
| Active parameters | 23B | Unknown |
| License | other | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Cerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
16 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
MiniMax M3 Capabilities
Gemma 4 31B Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax | vs | MiniMax-M3MiniMax | family variantstext |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
MiniMax M3 vs Gemma 4 31B FAQs
Is MiniMax M3 or Gemma 4 31B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both MiniMax M3 and Gemma 4 31B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3 or Gemma 4 31B?+
MiniMax M3 is $0.28 and Gemma 4 31B is $0.090 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric. MiniMax M3 is $1.10 and Gemma 4 31B is $0.34 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, MiniMax M3 or Gemma 4 31B?+
MiniMax M3 has the larger sourced context window. MiniMax M3 supports 1,049K and Gemma 4 31B supports 262K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, MiniMax M3 or Gemma 4 31B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can MiniMax M3 or Gemma 4 31B be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. MiniMax M3 is open weight; Gemma 4 31B is open weight.
Can MiniMax M3 and Gemma 4 31B understand images?+
MiniMax M3 is documented with image input; Gemma 4 31B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, MiniMax M3 or Gemma 4 31B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. MiniMax M3 is — and Gemma 4 31B is —.
Do MiniMax M3 and Gemma 4 31B support reasoning and tool use?+
MiniMax M3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Gemma 4 31B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, MiniMax M3 or Gemma 4 31B?+
MiniMax M3 has 5 sourced provider routes; Gemma 4 31B has 5, a tie.
Which offers better value, MiniMax M3 or Gemma 4 31B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.