Gemma 4 31B vs Kimi K3
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Gemma 4 31B | Kimi-K3 |
|---|---|---|
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2 | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort | #11 of 2271.3 score |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #24 of 36$0.194 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0 | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort | #13 of 2251.7 score |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | Kimi-K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,441.8298% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1434.27306811, 1449.35895578]; votes 5900; rank 60 | 1,476.31100% of row best · rating · kimi-k3-max; 95% CI [1470.86166728, 1481.76254962]; votes 17895; rank 16 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 1 benchmark winOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemma 4 31B | Kimi-K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Moonshot AI |
| Family | Gemma 4 | Kimi K3 |
| Model | Gemma 4 31B | Kimi-K3 |
| Version | Gemma 4 31B | Kimi-K3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2026-07-16 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | 31B | 2.8T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 104B |
| License | apache-2.0 | other |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Cerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning |
16 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Gemma 4 31B Capabilities
Kimi K3 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemma 4 31B vs Kimi K3 FAQs
Is Gemma 4 31B or Kimi K3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 31B and Kimi K3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Kimi K3?+
Gemma 4 31B is $0.090 and Kimi K3 is $2.85 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric. Gemma 4 31B is $0.34 and Kimi K3 is $14.25 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 31B or Kimi K3?+
Kimi K3 has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 31B supports 262K and Kimi K3 supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B or Kimi K3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemma 4 31B or Kimi K3 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Gemma 4 31B is open weight; Kimi K3 is open weight.
Can Gemma 4 31B and Kimi K3 understand images?+
Gemma 4 31B is documented with image input; Kimi K3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 31B or Kimi K3?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 31B is — and Kimi K3 is —.
Do Gemma 4 31B and Kimi K3 support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemma 4 31B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 31B or Kimi K3?+
Gemma 4 31B has 5 sourced provider routes; Kimi K3 has 5, a tie.
Which offers better value, Gemma 4 31B or Kimi K3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.