Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.8 Max

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingGemma 4 31BQwen3.8-Max
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort#19 of 36$0.107 per LiveBench case

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkGemma 4 31BQwen3.8-Max
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-08-31-011508720696 · outcome_score · leader-22.3373% of row best · score · Gemma 4 31B; 95% CI [-25.65092528, -19.00692476]; sessions 56661; observations 703574; rank 566.01100% of row best · score · Qwen3.8 Max; 95% CI [4.88117795, 7.13339178]; sessions 18386; observations 1372080; rank 14
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,441.8297% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1434.27306811, 1449.35895578]; votes 5900; rank 601,479.56100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1473.34740586, 1485.77213629]; votes 13136; rank 12
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,275.9497% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1269.53471972, 1282.35229256]; votes 34348; rank 311,312.86100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1304.57707433, 1321.13715544]; votes 7244; rank 6
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins3 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Google DeepMind · activeGemma 4 31BVerified Sep 3, 2026
Qwen · activeQwen3.8 MaxVerified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldGemma 4 31BQwen3.8-Max
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindQwen
FamilyGemma 4Qwen3 8 Max
ModelGemma 4 31BQwen3.8-Max
VersionGemma 4 31BQwen3.8-Max
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-03-11Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,000K
Total parameters31B2.4T
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessCerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

14 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Gemma 4 31B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$0.090
Output price$0.34
Serving providers5
Canonical IDgoogle/gemma-4-31B-it

Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$1.65
Output price$4.951
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.8-max

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsdeveloper peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs

Is Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Gemma 4 31B is $0.090 and Qwen3.8 Max is $1.65 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric. Gemma 4 31B is $0.34 and Qwen3.8 Max is $4.951 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 31B supports 262K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+

Gemma 4 31B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemma 4 31B is open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.

Can Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+

Gemma 4 31B is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 31B is — and Qwen3.8 Max is 131K.

Do Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemma 4 31B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Gemma 4 31B has 5 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Gemma 4 31B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback