Gemma 4 31B vs Hy4 preview

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Google DeepMind · activeGemma 4 31BVerified Sep 3, 2026
Tencent · previewHy4 previewVerified Sep 2, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldGemma 4 31BHy4 preview
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindTencent
FamilyGemma 4Hy4
ModelGemma 4 31BHy4 preview
VersionGemma 4 31BHy4 preview
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-03-112026-08-28
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,000K
Total parameters31B770B
Active parametersUnknown49B
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessCerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

16 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Gemma 4 31B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$0.090
Output price$0.34
Serving providers5
Canonical IDgoogle/gemma-4-31B-it

Hy4 preview Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.834
Output price$2.501
Serving providers1
Canonical IDtencent/Hy4-preview

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsdeveloper peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemma 4 31B vs Hy4 preview FAQs

Is Gemma 4 31B or Hy4 preview better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 31B and Hy4 preview, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Hy4 preview?+

Gemma 4 31B is $0.090 and Hy4 preview is $0.834 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric. Gemma 4 31B is $0.34 and Hy4 preview is $2.501 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 31B or Hy4 preview?+

Hy4 preview has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 31B supports 262K and Hy4 preview supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B or Hy4 preview?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemma 4 31B or Hy4 preview be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Gemma 4 31B is open weight; Hy4 preview is open weight.

Can Gemma 4 31B and Hy4 preview understand images?+

Gemma 4 31B is documented with image input; Hy4 preview is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 31B or Hy4 preview?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 31B is — and Hy4 preview is —.

Do Gemma 4 31B and Hy4 preview support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemma 4 31B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hy4 preview: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 31B or Hy4 preview?+

Gemma 4 31B has 5 sourced provider routes; Hy4 preview has 1, so Gemma 4 31B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemma 4 31B or Hy4 preview?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback