Gemma 4 31B vs Grok 4.5

At a Glance

Compare
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#25 of 4660.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#15 of 44$0.063 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#11 of 3859.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.090Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$2.00Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.34Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$6.00Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K500K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BGrok 4.5
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,424.5198% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1416.71159012, 1432.31286462]; votes 12326; rank 351,451.96100% of row best · rating · grok-4.5; 95% CI [1443.26182849, 1460.65626012]; votes 4965; rank 26
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,441.6899% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1434.13929794, 1449.22204224]; votes 5894; rank 641,450.13100% of row best · rating · grok-4.5; 95% CI [1445.44268767, 1454.81726995]; votes 30103; rank 45
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,275.9899% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1269.84273447, 1282.11308989]; votes 35713; rank 331,288.54100% of row best · rating · grok-4.5; 95% CI [1280.47745270, 1296.60872281]; votes 8355; rank 24
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 2 ties0 benchmark winsNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemma 4 31BGrok 4.5
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindxAI
FamilyGemma 4Grok 4
ModelGemma 4 31BGrok 4.5
VersionGemma 4 31BGrok 4.5
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-03-112026-07-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K500K
Total parameters31BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessCerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Gemma 4 31B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers5
Canonical IDgoogle/gemma-4-31B-it

Grok 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemma 4 31B vs Grok 4.5 FAQs

Is Gemma 4 31B or Grok 4.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 31B and Grok 4.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Grok 4.5?+

Gemma 4 31B is $0.090 and Grok 4.5 is $2.00 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric. Gemma 4 31B is $0.34 and Grok 4.5 is $6.00 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 31B or Grok 4.5?+

Grok 4.5 has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 31B supports 262K and Grok 4.5 supports 500K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B or Grok 4.5?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Gemma 4 31B or Grok 4.5 be self-hosted?+

Gemma 4 31B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemma 4 31B is open weight; Grok 4.5 is not marked open weight.

Can Gemma 4 31B and Grok 4.5 understand images?+

Gemma 4 31B is documented with image input; Grok 4.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 31B or Grok 4.5?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 31B is — and Grok 4.5 is —.

Do Gemma 4 31B and Grok 4.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemma 4 31B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 31B or Grok 4.5?+

Gemma 4 31B has 5 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.5 has 1, so Gemma 4 31B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemma 4 31B or Grok 4.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback