Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-5 Mini
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind |  GPT-5 MiniOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #45 of 460.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 0.0–33.4 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.090Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $0.125Openrouter ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.34Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $1.00Openrouter ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 400K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,441.68100% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1434.13929794, 1449.22204224]; votes 5894; rank 64 | 1,372.9695% of row best · rating · gpt-5-mini-high; 95% CI [1368.38533638, 1377.53632183]; votes 26569; rank 166 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,275.98100% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1269.84273447, 1282.11308989]; votes 35713; rank 33 | 1,201.9094% of row best · rating · gpt-5-mini-high; 95% CI [1194.06379328, 1209.74466964]; votes 28970; rank 78 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 2 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemma 4 31B | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | OpenAI |
| Family | Gemma 4 | Gpt 5 |
| Model | Gemma 4 31B | GPT-5 Mini |
| Version | Gemma 4 31B | GPT-5 Mini |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2025-08-07 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2024-05-31 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 400K |
| Total parameters | 31B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Cerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Gemma 4 31B Capabilities
GPT-5 Mini Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-5 Mini FAQs
Is Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5 Mini better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 31B and GPT-5 Mini, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5 Mini?+
Gemma 4 31B is $0.090 and GPT-5 Mini is $0.125 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric. Gemma 4 31B is $0.34 and GPT-5 Mini is $1.00 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5 Mini?+
GPT-5 Mini has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 31B supports 262K and GPT-5 Mini supports 400K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5 Mini?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5 Mini be self-hosted?+
Gemma 4 31B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemma 4 31B is open weight; GPT-5 Mini is not marked open weight.
Can Gemma 4 31B and GPT-5 Mini understand images?+
Gemma 4 31B is documented with image input; GPT-5 Mini is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5 Mini?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 31B is — and GPT-5 Mini is 128K.
Do Gemma 4 31B and GPT-5 Mini support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemma 4 31B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5 Mini: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5 Mini?+
Gemma 4 31B has 5 sourced provider routes; GPT-5 Mini has 2, so Gemma 4 31B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5 Mini?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.