Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Luna
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind |  GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #9 of 4679.7 score · 3/3 sources · complete | #31 of 4652.7 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #27 of 44$0.161 per LiveBench case | #6 of 44$0.026 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #9 of 3859.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete | #4 of 3864.8 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.00Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.20Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $12.00Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $1.20Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 1,050K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader | 98.00100% of row best · percent · Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | 90.6793% of row best · percent · GPT-5.6 Luna 2026-07-30 (Max) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader | 77.08100% of row best · percent · Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | 59.5877% of row best · percent · GPT-5.6 Luna 2026-07-30 (Max) |
| LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader | -5.8195% of row best · score · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview; 95% CI [-6.60162758, -5.00976712]; sessions 86017; observations 2915267; rank 38 | -0.44100% of row best · score · GPT 5.6 Luna (xHigh); 95% CI [-1.27310649, 0.39719069]; sessions 29186; observations 2307801; rank 27 |
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,443.9299% of row best · rating · gemini-3.1-pro-preview; 95% CI [1438.69417039, 1449.14324048]; votes 49457; rank 31 | 1,456.92100% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh; 95% CI [1448.72029252, 1465.11301394]; votes 5766; rank 23 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,480.08100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.1-pro-preview; 95% CI [1476.92899018, 1483.22190450]; votes 106951; rank 16 | 1,429.8997% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh; 95% CI [1425.11549148, 1434.66063238]; votes 28547; rank 86 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,295.61100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.1-pro-preview; 95% CI [1290.13797622, 1301.07924121]; votes 40691; rank 19 | 1,258.5397% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh; 95% CI [1250.17799393, 1266.87249678]; votes 7793; rank 48 |
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 81.66100% of row best · percent · gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high · 13,380 output tokens / case | 77.0594% of row best · percent · gpt-5.6-luna-max · 21,799 output tokens / case |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 79.8995% of row best · points · Gemini 3.1 Pro (high thinking) · 10,009 output tokens / case | 84.47100% of row best · points · GPT-5.6 Luna (ultra) · 17,605 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie | 5 benchmark winsOverall lead | 1 benchmark win |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Quality Versus Estimated Output Cost
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 3.1 Pro | GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | OpenAI |
| Family | Gemini 3 | Gpt 5 6 |
| Model | Gemini 3.1 Pro | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Version | Gemini 3.1 Pro | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Lifecycle | preview | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2026-02-16 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,050K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Capabilities
GPT-5.6 Luna Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Luna FAQs
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.6 Luna better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.6 Luna, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.6 Luna?+
Gemini 3.1 Pro is $2.00 and GPT-5.6 Luna is $0.20 per million tokens, so GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3.1 Pro is $12.00 and GPT-5.6 Luna is $1.20 per million tokens, so GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.6 Luna?+
GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1,049K and GPT-5.6 Luna supports 1,050K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.6 Luna?+
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 7 protocol-matched benchmarks from 3 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.6 Luna be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3.1 Pro is not marked open weight; GPT-5.6 Luna is not marked open weight.
Can Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.6 Luna understand images?+
Gemini 3.1 Pro is documented with image input; GPT-5.6 Luna is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.6 Luna?+
GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger sourced maximum output: Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 66K and GPT-5.6 Luna supports 128K output tokens.
Do Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.6 Luna support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 3.1 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.6 Luna: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.6 Luna?+
Gemini 3.1 Pro has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.6 Luna has 2, a tie.
Which offers better value, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.6 Luna?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.