Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Hy4 preview

Why this pair: Current Tencent and Google preview flagships

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Google DeepMind · previewGemini 3.1 ProVerified Aug 29, 2026
Tencent · previewHy4 previewVerified Sep 2, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

CuratedIndexable
FieldGemini 3.1 ProHy4 preview
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindTencent
FamilyGemini 3Hy4
ModelGemini 3.1 ProHy4 preview
VersionGemini 3.1 ProHy4 preview
Lifecyclepreviewpreview
ReleasedUnknown2026-08-28
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,048,5761,000,000
Total parametersUnknown770,000,000,000
Active parametersUnknown49,000,000,000
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesNo
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard)Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

13 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Editorially curated pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Gemini 3.1 Pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$2.00
Output price$12.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3.1-pro-preview

Hy4 preview Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.834
Output price$2.501
Serving providers1
Canonical IDtencent/Hy4-preview

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Hy4 preview FAQs

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hy4 preview better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Hy4 preview, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hy4 preview?+

Gemini 3.1 Pro is $2.00 and Hy4 preview is $0.834 per million tokens, so Hy4 preview is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3.1 Pro is $12.00 and Hy4 preview is $2.501 per million tokens, so Hy4 preview is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hy4 preview?+

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1,048,576 and Hy4 preview supports 1,000,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hy4 preview?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hy4 preview be self-hosted?+

Hy4 preview is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemini 3.1 Pro is not marked open weight; Hy4 preview is open weight.

Can Gemini 3.1 Pro and Hy4 preview understand images?+

Gemini 3.1 Pro is documented with image input; Hy4 preview is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hy4 preview?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3.1 Pro is 65,536 and Hy4 preview is —.

Do Gemini 3.1 Pro and Hy4 preview support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3.1 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hy4 preview: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hy4 preview?+

Gemini 3.1 Pro has 1 sourced provider route; Hy4 preview has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Hy4 preview?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback