MiniMax M3 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Market Position
LiveBench Quality Versus Estimated Output Cost
This current-market view appears only when both compared models are reviewed current models with publisher-reported LiveBench token accounting and current sourced USD output rates.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-07-30-011508720696 · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,434.8299% of row best · rating · minimax-m3; 95% CI [1426.45297239, 1443.17975284]; votes 6263; rank 26 | 1,445.32100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.1-pro-preview; 95% CI [1439.35538449, 1451.29339146]; votes 45162; rank 23 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,435.2097% of row best · rating · minimax-m3; 95% CI [1430.86827835, 1439.53977389]; votes 44544; rank 77 | 1,480.10100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.1-pro-preview; 95% CI [1476.89767236, 1483.30025658]; votes 102763; rank 11 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,255.4297% of row best · rating · minimax-m3; 95% CI [1247.93588333, 1262.90862002]; votes 13390; rank 44 | 1,295.39100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.1-pro-preview; 95% CI [1289.75236576, 1301.03738662]; votes 39412; rank 17 |
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 70.2686% of row best · percent · minimax-m3 · 15,530 output tokens / case | 81.66100% of row best · percent · gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high · 13,380 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie | 0 benchmark wins | 3 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | MiniMax-M3 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | MiniMax | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Minimax M3 | Gemini 3 |
| Model | MiniMax-M3 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| Version | MiniMax-M3 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-06-01 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | 427B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 23B | Unknown |
| License | other | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
13 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
MiniMax M3 Capabilities
Gemini 3.1 Pro Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax | vs | MiniMax-M3MiniMax | family variantstext |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
MiniMax M3 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro FAQs
Is MiniMax M3 or Gemini 3.1 Pro better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both MiniMax M3 and Gemini 3.1 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
MiniMax M3 is $0.28 and Gemini 3.1 Pro is $2.00 per million tokens, so MiniMax M3 is cheaper on this metric. MiniMax M3 is $1.10 and Gemini 3.1 Pro is $12.00 per million tokens, so MiniMax M3 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, MiniMax M3 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. MiniMax M3 is 1,049K and Gemini 3.1 Pro is 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, MiniMax M3 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can MiniMax M3 or Gemini 3.1 Pro be self-hosted?+
MiniMax M3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. MiniMax M3 is open weight; Gemini 3.1 Pro is not marked open weight.
Can MiniMax M3 and Gemini 3.1 Pro understand images?+
MiniMax M3 is documented with image input; Gemini 3.1 Pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, MiniMax M3 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. MiniMax M3 is — and Gemini 3.1 Pro is 66K.
Do MiniMax M3 and Gemini 3.1 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+
MiniMax M3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Gemini 3.1 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, MiniMax M3 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
MiniMax M3 has 5 sourced provider routes; Gemini 3.1 Pro has 2, so MiniMax M3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, MiniMax M3 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.