DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3 Coder Flash
At a Glance
| Compare |  DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.30Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 | $0.195Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.60Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 | $0.975Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Qwen3 Coder Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Qwen |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Pro | Qwen3 Coder |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Qwen3 Coder Flash |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Qwen3 Coder Flash |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-08-13 | 2025-07-28 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 1.6T | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 49B | Unknown |
| License | mit | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities
Qwen3 Coder Flash Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-BaseDeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs | Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs | GLM-5.2Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3 Coder Flash FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 Coder Flash better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3 Coder Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 Coder Flash?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 and Qwen3 Coder Flash is $0.195 per million tokens, so Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 and Qwen3 Coder Flash is $0.975 per million tokens, so Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 Coder Flash?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 supports 1,048,576 tokens and Qwen3 Coder Flash supports 1,000,000 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 Coder Flash?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 Coder Flash be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is documented as self-hostable; Qwen3 Coder Flash is documented as not self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight; Qwen3 Coder Flash is not marked open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3 Coder Flash understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input; Qwen3 Coder Flash is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 Coder Flash?+
Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.
Do DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3 Coder Flash support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Qwen3 Coder Flash: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 Coder Flash?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3 sourced provider routes; Qwen3 Coder Flash has 2, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3 Coder Flash?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.