DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
At a Glance
| Compare |  DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.22DeepSeek ↗ · Sep 2, 2026 | $1.30Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 20, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.66DeepSeek ↗ · Sep 2, 2026 | $2.60Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 20, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench2026-06-25-90f8d44da965 · overall · leader | 79.6797% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp · 52,644 output tokens / case | 81.91100% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 36,339 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | DeepSeek |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Flash Vision Exp | Deepseek V4 Pro |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
| Lifecycle | retired | active |
| Released | 2026-08-21 | 2026-08-13 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | 304.6B | 1.6T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 49B |
| License | mit | mit |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | agents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools |
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Capabilities
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | family variantsimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | family variantstext |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  Muse Glimmer 30BMeta | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is $0.22 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is $0.66 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
Both models have the same sourced context window: 1,048,576 tokens each.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is open weight; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is documented with image input; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has a sourced maximum output of 393,216 tokens; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.
Do DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has 3 sourced provider routes; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3, a tie.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.