DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4#19 of 5757.9 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 38.6–72.0UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#10 of 27$0.054 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.9#11 of 2751.5 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 41.9–58.5UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.66DeepSeek ↗ · Sep 2, 2026$1.30Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.5441Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026$2.60Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · statistical tie1,451.16100% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro; 95% CI [1447.27741116, 1455.03943137]; votes 57594; rank 491,445.55100% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro-high-20260813; 95% CI [1438.98161909, 1452.11869256]; votes 9800; rank 61
LiveBench2026-06-25-90f8d44da965 · overall · leader76.7994% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-pro · 35,014 output tokens / case81.91100% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-pro-0813 · 36,339 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-10-17-10-task-e9c76358afb2 · overall_score · unverified73.0791% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4 Pro (xhigh) · 17,924 output tokens / case80.12100% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) · 34,473 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie0 benchmark winsNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
DeveloperDeepSeekDeepSeek
FamilyDeepseek V4 ProDeepseek V4 Pro
ModelDeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
VersionDeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-242026-08-13
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,049K
Total parameters1.6T1.6T
Active parameters49B49B
Licensemitmit
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools

DeepSeek V4 Pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers6
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro is $0.66 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro is $1.5441 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+

Both models have the same sourced context window: 1,048,576 tokens each.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Pro is open weight; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro is not documented with image input; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+

Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.

Do DeepSeek V4 Pro and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro: reasoning. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro has 6 sourced provider routes; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3, so DeepSeek V4 Pro has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback