DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM 5.2

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GLM 5.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 and GLM 5.2 is $0.75 per million tokens, so GLM 5.2 is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 and GLM 5.2 is $2.40 per million tokens, so GLM 5.2 is cheaper on this metric.

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is 1,049K and GLM 5.2 is 1,049K.

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight; GLM 5.2 is open weight.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input; GLM 5.2 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is — and GLM 5.2 is —.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. GLM 5.2: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3 sourced provider routes; GLM 5.2 has 5, so GLM 5.2 has broader tracked availability.

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.