DeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Why this pair: DeepSeek V4 Pro and lower-cost V4 Flash tiers
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #2 of 36$0.0060 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-2aa739d957fc · verified_score · leader | 89.0098% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | 90.50100% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Low) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-b5cb5ec6e8c7 · verified_score · leader | 61.39100% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | 61.25100% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winTied overall | 1 benchmark winTied overall |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | DeepSeek |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Flash | Deepseek V4 Pro |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | 2026-08-13 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | 290.9B | 1.6T |
| Active parameters | 13B | 49B |
| License | mit | mit |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning | agents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools |
17 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Editorially curated pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
DeepSeek V4 Flash Capabilities
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Flash and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.0868 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.1736 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. DeepSeek V4 Flash is 1,049K and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Flash is open weight; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash is not documented with image input; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Flash or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Flash is — and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is —.
Do DeepSeek V4 Flash and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash: reasoning. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Flash or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash has 5 sourced provider routes; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3, so DeepSeek V4 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Flash or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.