Model comparison · text

DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs GLM-5.2

Symmetrical, primary-source facts with unknown values left visible. No winner is assigned without comparable measurements.

FieldAt a glance
DeepSeek · activeDeepSeek-V4-FlashVerified Aug 28, 2026
Z.ai · activeGLM-5.2Verified Aug 28, 2026

Technical differences

Side-by-side facts

Indexable
FieldDeepSeek-V4-FlashGLM-5.2
DeveloperDeepSeekZ.ai
FamilyDeepseek V4 FlashGlm 5 2
ModelDeepSeek-V4-FlashGLM-5.2
VersionDeepSeek-V4-FlashGLM-5.2
Lifecycleactiveactive
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window10485761048576
Total parameters290944616402753329940480
Active parameters13000000000Unknown
Licensemitmit
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, generation, reasoning, tools

14 comparable fields · 6 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Primary benchmark evidence

Comparable performance

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-FlashGLM-5.2
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall69.6734,434 output tokens / case76.9623,463 output tokens / case · higher score

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; configuration and token spend remain visible.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price$0.0868
Output price$0.1736
Serving providers1
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash

GLM-5.2 capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$1.19
Output price$3.74
Serving providers1
Canonical IDzai-org/GLM-5.2

Internal comparison graph

Related comparisons

All text comparisons →

Primary evidence

Sources and freshness