Claude Opus 4.5 vs o3-pro

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Anthropic · activeClaude Opus 4.5Verified Sep 3, 2026
Openai · activeo3-proVerified Sep 3, 2026
Not a Valid ComparisonThese records do not share a sourced modality and workload.

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Interactive only
FieldClaude Opus 4.5o3-pro
DeveloperAnthropicOpenai
FamilyClaude 4O3
ModelClaude Opus 4.5o3-pro
VersionClaude Opus 4.5o3-pro
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-11-242025-06-10
Knowledge cutoff2025-05-012024-06-01
Input modalitiesUnknownText, Image
Output modalitiesUnknownText
Context window200,000200,000
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

13 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Interactive comparison only; indexing gate not met

Claude Opus 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-opus-4-5

o3-pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$20.00
Output price$80.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/o3-pro

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Opus 4.5 vs o3-pro FAQs

Is Claude Opus 4.5 or o3-pro better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.5 and o3-pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or o3-pro?+

Only o3-pro has a directly sourced input price: $20.00 per million tokens. Only o3-pro has a directly sourced output price: $80.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or o3-pro?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Opus 4.5 is 200,000 and o3-pro is 200,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 or o3-pro?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Opus 4.5 or o3-pro be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 4.5 is not marked open weight; o3-pro is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Opus 4.5 and o3-pro understand images?+

Claude Opus 4.5 is not documented with image input; o3-pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.5 or o3-pro?+

o3-pro has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Opus 4.5 supports 64,000 and o3-pro supports 100,000 output tokens.

Do Claude Opus 4.5 and o3-pro support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Opus 4.5: reasoning and tool calling. o3-pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.5 or o3-pro?+

Claude Opus 4.5 has 1 sourced provider route; o3-pro has 2, so o3-pro has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.5 or o3-pro?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback