Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026$3.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$25.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026$15.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K200K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboardv4-ede5081a24bc · overall_accuracy · leader33.47100% of row best · percent · Claude-Opus-4-5-20251101 (Prompt)24.9074% of row best · percent · Claude-Sonnet-4-5-20250929 (Prompt)
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,462.20100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-20251101; 95% CI [1451.78988580, 1472.60655272]; votes 7981; rank 211,449.8199% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929; 95% CI [1443.68972646, 1455.92640287]; votes 31455; rank 28
LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-10-13-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · leader1,179.58100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-search; 95% CI [1173.98777416, 1185.18060388]; votes 65047; rank 251,160.2798% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-5-search; 95% CI [1155.14751166, 1165.38826265]; votes 144153; rank 31
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · leader1,448.19100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-20251101-high-32k; 95% CI [1444.36613918, 1452.02144591]; votes 37509; rank 541,434.5899% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-high-32k; 95% CI [1431.82164426, 1437.34230911]; votes 83940; rank 88
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie3 benchmark winsOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Opus 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic
FamilyClaude 4Claude 4
ModelClaude Opus 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
VersionClaude Opus 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-11-242025-09-29
Knowledge cutoff2025-05-012025-01-01
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K200K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard)Anthropic (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Claude Opus 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-opus-4-5

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 FAQs

Is Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+

Claude Opus 4.5 is $5.00 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $3.00 per million tokens, so Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 4.5 is $25.00 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $15.00 per million tokens, so Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+

Both models have the same sourced context window: 200,000 tokens each.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+

Claude Opus 4.5 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 4.5 is not marked open weight; Claude Sonnet 4.5 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Opus 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 understand images?+

Claude Opus 4.5 is documented with image input; Claude Sonnet 4.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+

Both models have the same sourced maximum output: 64,000 tokens each.

Do Claude Opus 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Opus 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Claude Sonnet 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+

Claude Opus 4.5 has 1 sourced provider route; Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback