Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $3.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $25.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $15.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 200K | 200K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboardv4-ede5081a24bc · overall_accuracy · leader | 33.47100% of row best · percent · Claude-Opus-4-5-20251101 (Prompt) | 24.9074% of row best · percent · Claude-Sonnet-4-5-20250929 (Prompt) |
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,462.20100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-20251101; 95% CI [1451.78988580, 1472.60655272]; votes 7981; rank 21 | 1,449.8199% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929; 95% CI [1443.68972646, 1455.92640287]; votes 31455; rank 28 |
| LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-10-13-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · leader | 1,179.58100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-search; 95% CI [1173.98777416, 1185.18060388]; votes 65047; rank 25 | 1,160.2798% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-5-search; 95% CI [1155.14751166, 1165.38826265]; votes 144153; rank 31 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · leader | 1,448.19100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-20251101-high-32k; 95% CI [1444.36613918, 1452.02144591]; votes 37509; rank 54 | 1,434.5899% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-high-32k; 95% CI [1431.82164426, 1437.34230911]; votes 83940; rank 88 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie | 3 benchmark winsOverall lead | 0 benchmark wins |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Opus 4.5 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Family | Claude 4 | Claude 4 |
| Model | Claude Opus 4.5 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Version | Claude Opus 4.5 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-11-24 | 2025-09-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-05-01 | 2025-01-01 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 200K | 200K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard) | Anthropic (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Claude Opus 4.5 Capabilities
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 FAQs
Is Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+
Claude Opus 4.5 is $5.00 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $3.00 per million tokens, so Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 4.5 is $25.00 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $15.00 per million tokens, so Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+
Both models have the same sourced context window: 200,000 tokens each.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+
Claude Opus 4.5 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 4.5 is not marked open weight; Claude Sonnet 4.5 is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Opus 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 understand images?+
Claude Opus 4.5 is documented with image input; Claude Sonnet 4.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+
Both models have the same sourced maximum output: 64,000 tokens each.
Do Claude Opus 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Opus 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Claude Sonnet 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+
Claude Opus 4.5 has 1 sourced provider route; Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 1, a tie.
Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.