Claude Opus 4.5 vs o3
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Opus 4.5 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Openai |
| Family | Claude 4 | O3 |
| Model | Claude Opus 4.5 | o3 |
| Version | Claude Opus 4.5 | o3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-11-24 | 2025-04-16 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-05-01 | 2024-06-01 |
| Input modalities | Unknown | Unknown |
| Output modalities | Unknown | Unknown |
| Context window | 200,000 | 200,000 |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
13 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Interactive comparison only; indexing gate not met
Claude Opus 4.5 Capabilities
o3 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
o3OpenAI | vs | o3-proOpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | vs | Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | vs | o3-proOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | vs | o3OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | vs | Gemma 4 12BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
o3OpenAI | vs | Qwen3 VL FlashQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | o3OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | vs | GPT-5OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | vs | GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | vs | GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Opus 4.5 vs o3 FAQs
Is Claude Opus 4.5 or o3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.5 and o3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or o3?+
Only o3 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only o3 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or o3?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Opus 4.5 is 200,000 and o3 is 200,000.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 or o3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Opus 4.5 or o3 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 4.5 is not marked open weight; o3 is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Opus 4.5 and o3 understand images?+
Claude Opus 4.5 is not documented with image input; o3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.5 or o3?+
o3 has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Opus 4.5 supports 64,000 and o3 supports 100,000 output tokens.
Do Claude Opus 4.5 and o3 support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Opus 4.5: reasoning and tool calling. o3: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.5 or o3?+
Claude Opus 4.5 has 1 sourced provider route; o3 has 2, so o3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.5 or o3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.