Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort#38 of 5715.7 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort#11 of 27$0.058 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.9UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort#26 of 2729.9 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026$0.20Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$25.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026$1.25Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K400K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5GPT-5.4 Nano
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader1,448.19100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-20251101-high-32k; 95% CI [1444.36613918, 1452.02144591]; votes 37509; rank 541,372.0195% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4-nano-high; 95% CI [1368.25704083, 1375.76986498]; votes 62396; rank 182
LiveBench2026-06-25-90f8d44da965 · overall · leader77.39100% of row best · percent · claude-opus-4-5-20251101-thinking-64k-high-effort · 15,203 output tokens / case75.2797% of row best · percent · gpt-5.4-nano-xhigh · 46,179 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above2 benchmark winsOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Opus 4.5GPT-5.4 Nano
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaude 4Gpt 5 4
ModelClaude Opus 4.5GPT-5.4 Nano
VersionClaude Opus 4.5GPT-5.4 Nano
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-11-242026-03-17
Knowledge cutoff2025-05-012025-08-31
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K400K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Claude Opus 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-opus-4-5

GPT-5.4 Nano Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.4-nano

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano FAQs

Is Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.4 Nano better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-5.4 Nano, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.4 Nano?+

Claude Opus 4.5 is $5.00 and GPT-5.4 Nano is $0.20 per million tokens, so GPT-5.4 Nano is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 4.5 is $25.00 and GPT-5.4 Nano is $1.25 per million tokens, so GPT-5.4 Nano is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.4 Nano?+

GPT-5.4 Nano has the larger sourced context window. Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens and GPT-5.4 Nano supports 400,000 tokens.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.4 Nano?+

Claude Opus 4.5 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.4 Nano be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 4.5 is not marked open weight; GPT-5.4 Nano is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-5.4 Nano understand images?+

Claude Opus 4.5 is documented with image input; GPT-5.4 Nano is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.4 Nano?+

GPT-5.4 Nano has the larger sourced maximum output. Claude Opus 4.5 supports 64,000 tokens and GPT-5.4 Nano supports 128,000 tokens.

Do Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-5.4 Nano support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Opus 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.4 Nano: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.4 Nano?+

Claude Opus 4.5 has 1 sourced provider route; GPT-5.4 Nano has 2, so GPT-5.4 Nano has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.4 Nano?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback