Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.5

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4#41 of 579.3 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.2–39.6UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026$5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026$25.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K200K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · leader1,419.9797% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1414.09579972, 1425.83505080]; votes 34677; rank 371,462.20100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-20251101; 95% CI [1451.78988580, 1472.60655272]; votes 7981; rank 21
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-0ebb411abf00 · arena_rating · leader1,396.6496% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.24930739, 1399.03971640]; votes 149199; rank 1591,448.19100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-20251101-high-32k; 95% CI [1444.36613918, 1452.02144591]; votes 37509; rank 54
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner2 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.5
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic
FamilyClaude 4 5Claude 4
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.5
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.5
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-152025-11-24
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2025-05-01
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K200K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Anthropic (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

Claude Opus 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-opus-4-5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.5 FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.5?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and Claude Opus 4.5 is $5.00 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and Claude Opus 4.5 is $25.00 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.5?+

Both models have the same sourced context window: 200,000 tokens each.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.5?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.5 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; Claude Opus 4.5 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.5 understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; Claude Opus 4.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.5?+

Both models have the same sourced maximum output: 64,000 tokens each.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Claude Opus 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.5?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Claude Opus 4.5 has 1, so Claude Haiku 4.5 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback