Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3 | #12 of 4676.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #33 of 44$0.241 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #19 of 3853.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $25.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 200K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader | 47.6751% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K) | 94.00100% of row best · percent · Claude Opus 4.6 (120K, High) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader | 4.036% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K) | 69.17100% of row best · percent · Claude Opus 4.6 (120K, High) |
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,419.9794% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1414.09579972, 1425.83505080]; votes 34677; rank 37 | 1,507.05100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-6; 95% CI [1501.18336037, 1512.92390326]; votes 41260; rank 4 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,396.6493% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.12644647, 1399.14715328]; votes 129278; rank 147 | 1,497.54100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-6; 95% CI [1494.14263199, 1500.94441396]; votes 75878; rank 5 |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 75.1589% of row best · points · Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10,996 output tokens / case | 84.21100% of row best · points · Claude Opus 4.6 · 13,556 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 4 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Family | Claude 4 5 | Claude 4 |
| Model | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Version | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2026-02-05 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2025-05-01 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 200K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard) | Anthropic (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities
Claude Opus 4.6 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 FAQs
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.6 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and Claude Opus 4.6 is $5.00 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and Claude Opus 4.6 is $25.00 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
Claude Opus 4.6 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
Claude Opus 4.6 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.6 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; Claude Opus 4.6 is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.6 understand images?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; Claude Opus 4.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
Claude Opus 4.6 has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 64K and Claude Opus 4.6 supports 128K output tokens.
Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.6 support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Claude Opus 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Claude Opus 4.6 has 1, so Claude Haiku 4.5 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.