Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K3

At a Glance

Compare
Kimi K3Moonshot AI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3#17 of 4670.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#30 of 44$0.194 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#21 of 3852.5 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$2.85Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$14.25Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi-K3
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader47.6750% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)94.50100% of row best · percent · Kimi K3 (Max)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader4.037% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)60.42100% of row best · percent · Kimi K3 (Max)
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,396.6495% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.12644647, 1399.14715328]; votes 129278; rank 1471,472.27100% of row best · rating · kimi-k3-max; 95% CI [1467.05577758, 1477.48944277]; votes 20987; rank 23
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified75.1585% of row best · points · Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10,996 output tokens / case88.19100% of row best · points · Kimi K3 · 15,023 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins3 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi-K3
DeveloperAnthropicMoonshot AI
FamilyClaude 4 5Kimi K3
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi-K3
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi-K3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-152026-07-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K1,049K
Total parametersUnknown2.8T
Active parametersUnknown104B
LicenseUnknownother
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K3 FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K3?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and Kimi K3 is $2.85 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and Kimi K3 is $14.25 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K3?+

Kimi K3 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and Kimi K3 supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K3?+

Kimi K3 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K3 be self-hosted?+

Kimi K3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; Kimi K3 is open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K3 understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; Kimi K3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 64K and Kimi K3 is —.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K3?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Kimi K3 has 5, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback