Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3#10 of 4679.2 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 52.8–86.1
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#23 of 44$0.107 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#6 of 3863.2 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 50.0–66.7
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$1.65Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$4.951Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.8-Max
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,396.6494% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.12644647, 1399.14715328]; votes 129278; rank 1471,480.55100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1474.79040793, 1486.31846927]; votes 16670; rank 14
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified75.1590% of row best · points · Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10,996 output tokens / case83.32100% of row best · points · Qwen3.8 Max · 22,888 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.8-Max
DeveloperAnthropicQwen
FamilyClaude 4 5Qwen3 8 Max
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.8-Max
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.8-Max
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-15Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K1,000K
Total parametersUnknown2.4T
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.8-max

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and Qwen3.8 Max is $1.65 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and Qwen3.8 Max is $4.951 per million tokens, so Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 64K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 131K output tokens.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback