Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4#41 of 579.3 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.2–39.6UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026$3.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026$15.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K200K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-613c385b0c93 · verified_score · leader47.6775% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)63.67100% of row best · percent · Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking 32K)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-be40992860f9 · verified_score · leader4.0330% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)13.61100% of row best · percent · Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking 32K)
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader1,419.9798% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1414.09579972, 1425.83505080]; votes 34677; rank 371,449.81100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929; 95% CI [1443.68972646, 1455.92640287]; votes 31455; rank 28
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader1,396.6497% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.24930739, 1399.03971640]; votes 149199; rank 1591,434.58100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-high-32k; 95% CI [1431.82164426, 1437.34230911]; votes 83940; rank 88
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins4 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic
FamilyClaude 4 5Claude 4
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-152025-09-29
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2025-01-01
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K200K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Anthropic (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $3.00 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $15.00 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+

Both models have the same sourced context window: 200,000 tokens each.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+

Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; Claude Sonnet 4.5 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; Claude Sonnet 4.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+

Both models have the same sourced maximum output: 64,000 tokens each.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Claude Sonnet 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 1, so Claude Haiku 4.5 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback