Claude Haiku 4.5 vs o3

At a Glance

Compare
o3OpenAI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4#41 of 579.3 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.2–39.6UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026$1.00Openrouter ↗ · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026$4.00Openrouter ↗ · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K200K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5o3
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaude 4 5O3
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5o3
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5o3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-152025-04-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2024-06-01
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K200K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

o3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/o3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs o3 FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and o3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and o3 is $1.00 per million tokens, so they are tied on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and o3 is $4.00 per million tokens, so o3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3?+

Both models have the same sourced context window: 200,000 tokens each.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; o3 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and o3 understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; o3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3?+

o3 has the larger sourced maximum output. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 64,000 tokens and o3 supports 100,000 tokens.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and o3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. o3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; o3 has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback