Claude Haiku 4.5 vs o3-pro

At a Glance

Compare
o3-proOpenAI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4#41 of 579.3 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.2–39.6UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026$20.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026$80.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K200K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5o3-pro
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaude 4 5O3
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5o3-pro
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5o3-pro
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-152025-06-10
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2024-06-01
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K200K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

o3-pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/o3-pro

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs o3-pro FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3-pro better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and o3-pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3-pro?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and o3-pro is $20.00 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and o3-pro is $80.00 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3-pro?+

Both models have the same sourced context window: 200,000 tokens each.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3-pro?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3-pro be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; o3-pro is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and o3-pro understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; o3-pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3-pro?+

o3-pro has the larger sourced maximum output. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 64,000 tokens and o3-pro supports 100,000 tokens.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and o3-pro support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. o3-pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3-pro?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; o3-pro has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o3-pro?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback