LMArena Vision Arena

LMArena · vision-2026-10-09-a64ca3b12b6e · Blind human preferences for multimodal responses in LMArena's vision arena.

Model Ranking

Source
#1Claude Fable 5Anthropic1,323.95rating—14,175claude-fable-5-high; 95% CI [1316.82313713, 1331.08571856]; votes 14175; rank 1unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#2Claude Opus 5Anthropic1,319.22rating—16,665claude-opus-5-high; 95% CI [1312.47954379, 1325.95953993]; votes 16665; rank 3unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#3Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic1,318.24rating—4,648claude-fable-5.1-max; 95% CI [1308.61778049, 1327.86146111]; votes 4648; rank 4unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#4Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic1,316.41rating—23,165claude-opus-4-7; 95% CI [1309.83870131, 1322.97989133]; votes 23165; rank 5unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#5Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind1,315.97rating—4,524gemini-3.7-flash-high; 95% CI [1306.20108292, 1325.73138242]; votes 4524; rank 6unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#6Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic1,315.64rating—22,304claude-opus-4-6-high; 95% CI [1309.23331588, 1322.04524655]; votes 22304; rank 7unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#7Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle DeepMind1,314.08rating—3,792gemini-3.8-flash-high; 95% CI [1303.54395703, 1324.61562115]; votes 3792; rank 8unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#8Qwen3.8 MaxQwen1,313.60rating—10,017qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1306.14335895, 1321.05468944]; votes 10017; rank 9unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#9Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind1,309.62rating—13,103gemini-3.5-flash-high; 95% CI [1302.66440457, 1316.57227728]; votes 13103; rank 12unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#10Muse Spark 1.3Meta1,309.35rating—4,550muse-spark-1.3-max; 95% CI [1299.58784189, 1319.11184130]; votes 4550; rank 13unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#11Muse Spark 1.2Meta1,304.55rating—1,954muse-spark-1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [1290.22866830, 1318.87305829]; votes 1954; rank 17unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#12GPT-5.4OpenAI1,303.15rating—29,881gpt-5.4-high; 95% CI [1297.39164127, 1308.90995855]; votes 29881; rank 18unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#13Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle DeepMind1,297.66rating—8,127gemini-3.6-flash-high; 95% CI [1289.51471576, 1305.80526574]; votes 8127; rank 20unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#14GPT-5.5OpenAI1,296.63rating—27,993gpt-5.5; 95% CI [1290.81697444, 1302.45204648]; votes 27993; rank 21unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#15Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind1,296.20rating—46,320gemini-3.1-pro-preview; 95% CI [1291.04958388, 1301.35691905]; votes 46320; rank 22unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#16GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai1,296.03rating—11,157glm-5.3-flash; 95% CI [1288.97978191, 1303.07121064]; votes 11157; rank 23unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#17Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic1,294.18rating—18,341claude-opus-4-8-high; 95% CI [1287.71437228, 1300.65034925]; votes 18341; rank 24unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#18Muse Spark 1.1Meta1,292.70rating—11,994muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1285.66303358, 1299.73172684]; votes 11994; rank 25unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#19GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI1,288.19rating—1,813gpt-6.1-sol-max; 95% CI [1273.83724449, 1302.54208160]; votes 1813; rank 30unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#20Grok 4.5xAI1,288.17rating—11,764grok-4.5; 95% CI [1280.98331591, 1295.35286239]; votes 11764; rank 31unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#21Gemini 3 FlashGoogle DeepMind1,285.15rating—39,145gemini-3-flash; 95% CI [1279.92496783, 1290.36579718]; votes 39145; rank 32unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#22Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI1,282.78rating—16,379kimi-k2.6; 95% CI [1275.98531996, 1289.57750584]; votes 16379; rank 33unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#23Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic1,282.47rating—27,422claude-sonnet-4-6; 95% CI [1276.33534417, 1288.60341882]; votes 27422; rank 34unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#24GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI1,281.39rating—10,907gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh; 95% CI [1273.98131322, 1288.80759068]; votes 10907; rank 35unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#25GPT-6 AstraOpenAI1,281.35rating—3,590gpt-6-astra-max; 95% CI [1270.63592513, 1292.07239183]; votes 3590; rank 36unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#26Qwen3.7 PlusQwen1,279.07rating—13,636qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1272.29971328, 1285.84102976]; votes 13636; rank 37unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#27Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind1,276.80rating—39,669gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1271.07071523, 1282.52723839]; votes 39669; rank 38unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#28Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic1,273.92rating—13,503claude-sonnet-5-high; 95% CI [1267.02186706, 1280.81063637]; votes 13503; rank 41unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#29Qwen3.8 27BQwen1,271.39rating—7,013qwen3.8-27b; 95% CI [1262.99100972, 1279.79432635]; votes 7013; rank 42unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#30GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI1,271.07rating—11,020gpt-5.6-terra-xhigh; 95% CI [1263.65540928, 1278.48964371]; votes 11020; rank 43unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#31Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI1,268.77rating—28,297kimi-k2.5-thinking; 95% CI [1263.09963340, 1274.44784290]; votes 28297; rank 44unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#32Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle DeepMindSelected model1,268.15rating—8,381gemini-3.5-flash-lite; 95% CI [1260.07450401, 1276.22711331]; votes 8381; rank 45unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#33Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle DeepMind1,263.29rating—88,805gemini-2.5-pro; 95% CI [1258.74589708, 1267.83852907]; votes 88805; rank 51unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#34Grok 4.6xAI1,263.14rating—6,495grok-4.6-high; 95% CI [1254.48523007, 1271.79468461]; votes 6495; rank 52unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#35Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen1,262.52rating—32,058qwen3.5-397b-a17b; 95% CI [1257.19517602, 1267.83577721]; votes 32058; rank 54unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#36Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle DeepMind1,259.70rating—23,943gemma-4-26b-a4b; 95% CI [1253.23971386, 1266.15382555]; votes 23943; rank 55unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#37Grok 4.20 Multi AgentxAI1,258.97rating—24,543grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1252.84769478, 1265.09117861]; votes 24543; rank 57unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#38GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI1,258.24rating—11,086gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh; 95% CI [1250.82216689, 1265.66350676]; votes 11086; rank 58unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#39MiniMax M3MiniMax1,253.11rating—19,026minimax-m3; 95% CI [1246.68252453, 1259.53765792]; votes 19026; rank 60unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#40GPT-5.1OpenAI1,249.84rating—9,861gpt-5.1-high; 95% CI [1242.04728848, 1257.64065919]; votes 9861; rank 63unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#41GPT-5.2OpenAI1,245.81rating—19,041gpt-5.2-high; 95% CI [1239.74622137, 1251.87027714]; votes 19041; rank 67unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#42GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI1,245.01rating—25,733gpt-5.4-mini-high; 95% CI [1238.81649273, 1251.21275945]; votes 25733; rank 68unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#43Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind1,235.45rating—60,112gemini-2.5-flash; 95% CI [1230.89884927, 1239.99599852]; votes 60112; rank 74unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#44Inkling SmallThinking Machines Lab1,235.32rating—7,472Inkling Small; 95% CI [1226.97211879, 1243.66134454]; votes 7472; rank 75unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#45Grok 4.3xAI1,229.24rating—27,037grok-4.3; 95% CI [1223.34663531, 1235.13960477]; votes 27037; rank 78unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#46Mistral Medium 3.5 128BMistral AI1,223.08rating—5,375mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1213.57754699, 1232.58266173]; votes 5375; rank 82unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#47Mistral Large 3Mistral AI1,220.76rating—8,643mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1212.81813492, 1228.69335345]; votes 8643; rank 83unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#48GPT-4.1OpenAI1,210.62rating—41,017gpt-4.1-2025-04-14; 95% CI [1203.95207689, 1217.29091390]; votes 41017; rank 87unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#49GPT-5OpenAI1,208.24rating—34,470gpt-5-high; 95% CI [1201.43993030, 1215.03686763]; votes 34470; rank 89unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#50GPT-5 MiniOpenAI1,202.14rating—28,959gpt-5-mini-high; 95% CI [1194.33907236, 1209.93452091]; votes 28959; rank 91unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#51GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI1,195.96rating—25,650gpt-5.4-nano-high; 95% CI [1189.64874058, 1202.27965668]; votes 25650; rank 94unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#52GPT-4.1 MiniOpenAI1,181.35rating—40,221gpt-4.1-mini-2025-04-14; 95% CI [1173.87762706, 1188.81616531]; votes 40221; rank 101unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#53GPT-5 NanoOpenAI1,159.22rating—3,929gpt-5-nano-high; 95% CI [1148.16831669, 1170.26403282]; votes 3929; rank 113unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#54Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E InstructMeta1,141.63rating—6,922llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1132.58229133, 1150.67926500]; votes 6922; rank 120unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#55Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E InstructMeta1,118.23rating—6,451llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct; 95% CI [1108.78959993, 1127.66568063]; votes 6451; rank 127unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#56GPT-4o MiniOpenAI1,065.60rating—17,341gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18; 95% CI [1057.29887437, 1073.89816601]; votes 17341; rank 135unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#57GPT-4oOpenAI1,064.52rating—3,376gpt-4o-2024-08-06; 95% CI [1052.04133780, 1077.00060680]; votes 3376; rank 136unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark
#58GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI1,063.24rating—1,211gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14; 95% CI [1044.95158579, 1081.52393740]; votes 1211; rank 137unknownOriginal sourcewinner eligibleThird-party benchmark

58 models ranked by the best winner-eligible current-version score when available, otherwise the best publisher-artifact score; highest first. Observed Oct 19, 2026. The model you came from is highlighted.

Methodology and Coverage

Ranking protocolarena rating · rating. Each model appears once; verified winner-eligible runs take precedence, and missing models are not imputed.
Acquisition coverage58 published models from 165 source rows; 98 source identities remain quarantined.

Primary Evidence

Publisher Artifacts

Questions

LMArena Vision Arena FAQs

What does LMArena Vision Arena measure?+

Blind human preferences for multimodal responses in LMArena's vision arena. Model Markets classifies it as a multimodal benchmark and preserves the publisher's vision-2026-10-09-a64ca3b12b6e release as a distinct comparison cohort.

How are models ranked on LMArena Vision Arena?+

Models are ordered by arena rating in rating, with higher scores ranked first. Each model appears once; a verified winner-eligible current-version result takes precedence over a publisher-artifact-only result, and missing scores are not estimated.

Which model currently leads LMArena Vision Arena?+

Claude Fable 5 leads the current verified table with 1,323.95 rating on vision-2026-10-09-a64ca3b12b6e. This is a benchmark-specific result, not a universal model-quality claim.

How many models have a published LMArena Vision Arena score?+

58 catalog models are published from 165 source rows. 98 source identities remain quarantined rather than guessed.

Can LMArena Vision Arena scores be compared with other benchmarks?+

Raw scores should be compared only within the same benchmark version, metric, and protocol. The Intelligence ranking normalizes its three pinned publisher inputs to a frozen reference range, requires at least one source, and labels one- and two-source rows provisional instead of estimating missing inputs. View aggregate rankings →

Why might a model be missing from LMArena Vision Arena?+

A model remains absent when the publisher has no current result, the source model identity is unresolved, the evaluation protocol is incompatible, or the evidence cannot be verified. Model Markets does not substitute a provider claim or infer a score from a related model.

How current is the LMArena Vision Arena leaderboard?+

The current Model Markets snapshot was observed Oct 19, 2026 from LMArena artifacts. The exact publisher source and each retained result artifact are linked on this page.

Send Feedback