Qwen3.7 Plus vs Inkling
At a Glance
| Compare | Qwen3.7 PlusQwen | InklingThinking Machines Lab |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #34 of 4645.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #18 of 44$0.090 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #28 of 3848.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.32Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $0.95Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.28Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $4.05Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7-Plus | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader | -6.08100% of row best · score · Qwen3.7 Plus; 95% CI [-7.29245632, -4.87295146]; sessions 20905; observations 993739; rank 40 | -10.0296% of row best · score · Inkling; 95% CI [-10.93664189, -9.10513108]; sessions 42313; observations 1624204; rank 42 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,454.20100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1449.75378609, 1458.63820942]; votes 39334; rank 39 | 1,439.6899% of row best · rating · inkling; 95% CI [1434.76600975, 1444.58550789]; votes 25922; rank 67 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 2 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3.7-Plus | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Family | Qwen3 7 Plus | Inkling |
| Model | Qwen3.7-Plus | Inkling |
| Version | Qwen3.7-Plus | Inkling |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-07-15 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 975B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 41B |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision | agents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools, vision |
Qwen3.7 Plus Capabilities
Inkling Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Inkling FAQs
Is Qwen3.7 Plus or Inkling better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.7 Plus and Inkling, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Inkling?+
Qwen3.7 Plus is $0.32 and Inkling is $0.95 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.7 Plus is $1.28 and Inkling is $4.05 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.7 Plus or Inkling?+
Inkling has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.7 Plus supports 1,000K and Inkling supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus or Inkling?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Qwen3.7 Plus or Inkling be self-hosted?+
Inkling is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Qwen3.7 Plus is not marked open weight; Inkling is open weight.
Can Qwen3.7 Plus and Inkling understand images?+
Qwen3.7 Plus is documented with image input; Inkling is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.7 Plus or Inkling?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.7 Plus is 131K and Inkling is —.
Do Qwen3.7 Plus and Inkling support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3.7 Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Inkling: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.7 Plus or Inkling?+
Qwen3.7 Plus has 4 sourced provider routes; Inkling has 4, a tie.
Which offers better value, Qwen3.7 Plus or Inkling?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.