Qwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.3
At a Glance
| Compare | Qwen3.7 PlusQwen | Grok 4.3xAI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #40 of 4616.6 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 11.1–44.4 |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #7 of 44$0.028 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #33 of 3846.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 43.3–59.9 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.32Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $1.25Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.28Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $2.50Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7-Plus | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,454.20100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1449.75378609, 1458.63820942]; votes 39334; rank 39 | 1,397.7396% of row best · rating · grok-4.3; 95% CI [1394.01930088, 1401.44639527]; votes 66801; rank 145 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,277.81100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1270.28208926, 1285.34488566]; votes 10656; rank 31 | 1,229.4796% of row best · rating · grok-4.3; 95% CI [1223.17337452, 1235.75913440]; votes 22688; rank 67 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 2 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3.7-Plus | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | xAI |
| Family | Qwen3 7 Plus | Grok 4 |
| Model | Qwen3.7-Plus | Grok 4.3 |
| Version | Qwen3.7-Plus | Grok 4.3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-06-17 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Qwen3.7 Plus Capabilities
Grok 4.3 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.3 FAQs
Is Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.7 Plus and Grok 4.3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.3?+
Qwen3.7 Plus is $0.32 and Grok 4.3 is $1.25 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.7 Plus is $1.28 and Grok 4.3 is $2.50 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.3?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Qwen3.7 Plus is 1,000K and Grok 4.3 is 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.3 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Qwen3.7 Plus is not marked open weight; Grok 4.3 is not marked open weight.
Can Qwen3.7 Plus and Grok 4.3 understand images?+
Qwen3.7 Plus is documented with image input; Grok 4.3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.3?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.7 Plus is 131K and Grok 4.3 is —.
Do Qwen3.7 Plus and Grok 4.3 support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3.7 Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.3?+
Qwen3.7 Plus has 4 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.3 has 1, so Qwen3.7 Plus has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3.7 Plus or Grok 4.3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.